☆ “More disappointed than shocked”: Stanford student org pres on Woke college takeovers

Last week, Stanford students/a DEI admin aggressively heckled controversial guest speaker Judge Kyle Duncan, disrupting and cutting short his prepared talk. Tim Rosenberger, Jr., president of Stanford Law’s Federalist Society chapter, sits down with Opp Now for an exclusive breakdown of Stanford’s dangerously “comfort”-driven student/faculty culture—and his proposed steps to restore diverse thought to the revered university.

Read More
Bullying woke Stanford Law students and DEI dean beclown once-proud institution

Fifth Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan was shouted down last week at a Stanford Law School event sponsored by the Federalist Society chapter. The disruption of Judge Duncan’s remarks was supported at the event by Associate Dean of DEI Tirien Steinbach. The wild suppression of Free Speech prompted a high profile apology from Stanford's president, but is it enough? David Lat's exceptional Original Jurisdiction has the whole story; excerpts below.

Read More
Jax Oliver
Analysis: Criminal leniency risks public safety

Frequently, those pushing for early prisoner release in the SCC cite dangers of “unnecessary incarceration.” However, says Rafael A. Mangual in Newsweek, most incarcerated individuals committed serious crimes (e.g., murder or armed burglary) to land them in jail — and 83% go on to commit more after being released. Rather than merely seeking to empty local prisons, Mangual suggests a more prudent approach to preserving public safety.

Read More
Jax Oliver
Commentary: Expected local HSR users drops by 25%

California’s high-speed rail disaster remains on the slow track, its projected completion presently looming in the 2030s. Ralph Vartabedian discusses in CalMatters that despite an incessant wealth of funding and time, the HSR project now anticipates 25% less ridership than previously predicted. Who is this HSR really made for, and will the rail be fiscally self-sufficient?

Read More
Jax Oliver
Judge blocks removal of Oakland tent camp, stalling solutions

California has long faced a homelessness epidemic nightmare, with plentiful encampments putting lives at risk in and outside of SJ; yet a federal judge has just prohibited Newsom’s planned removal of Oakland’s “tent city,” suggesting an anterior need for a resettlement plan. Debra J. Saunders analyzes in the American Spectator why enforcing existing homeless encampment laws will cultivate safer communities.

Read More
Jax Oliver
“Magical thinking,” not a dearth of funding, feeds Bay’s homelessness

The Spectator’s Debra J. Saunders speaks with San Fransicko author Michael Shellenberger about the Bay Area’s hazardously “altruis[tic]” approach to homelessness. While ignoring true underlying factors like substance abuse, current governance hopes that throwing more money at Housing First and similar initiatives will solve unhoused people’s situations—to no avail.

Read More
Jax Oliver
☆ Former CSD board candidate: Viable schools are run like businesses

This Opp Now exclusive features Monte Dauer, who ran for Cambrian School Board in November. Dauer argues that rather than regularly being bailed out with additional funds, local schools must be evaluated and compensated based on performance—how it works in the business world. His 2023 hopes and apprehensions for the CSD below.

Read More
Analysis: Ex-Californians overwhelmingly pour into Texas

In 2021, San Jose lost residents five times faster than the rest of California did. Currently, SCC locals continue migrating to other states like Texas in the tens of thousands each year—and they aren’t slowing down. The California Globe’s Sheridan Swanson parses this mounting concern using YTexas, Hartman Income REIT, and UHaul data.

Read More
Jax Oliver
Despite inadequate homeowner rebates, SJ staff weighs “Burn-Out Ordinance”

Advocates argue that a total ban on natural gas furnaces/water heaters, as the California Air Resources Board proposed last September, won’t empty residents’ wallets—because of existing rebate and incentive programs. Neighborhood group-based org Families & Homes SJ begs to differ. Existing programs will refund 10% max of residents’ expected costs, leaving $27,000+ out of pocket for locals already struggling with rent.

Read More
Lauren Oliver
Could local power grids support SJ’s shift from natural gas?

Adducing lofty environmental goals, State and County pols are calling for a ban on natural gas furnaces and water heaters by—or potentially before—2027. Unfortunately, as Families & Homes SJ points out, our grids haven’t caught up quite as fast. With no articulated plan to address increased grid load, the question remains: Can SJ sustain itself on renewables alone?

Read More
Lauren Oliver
SJ residents brace for upheaval as mandated gas appliance replacement looms

Families & Homes SJ digs into the messy implications of the City and Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) proposed gas-to-electric conversion mandate. This “Burn-Out Ordinance” could force locals to wait weeks for drastic residence updates. Further, many homes and businesses don’t have enough space (1,000 cubic feet, to be exact) to accommodate the prescribed heat-pump water heater, and may have to forfeit precious living space.

Read More
Lauren Oliver
Data says: Bay Area proposal to ban gas furnaces/water heaters to “Burn-Out”—holes in residents’ pockets

The Bay Area Air Quality Board District (BAAQBD) votes on March 15th whether to prohibit replacement of all natural gas furnaces and water heaters as early as 2027. Replacements at “burn-out” must be electric. Meanwhile, grassroots coalition Families & Homes San Jose, along with the SCC Association of Realtors (SCCAOR) and FHSJ members, has actually done the math: At $30–60k/home, conversions to meet the “Burn-Out Ordinance” requirements would prove too costly for most SJ families.

Read More
Lauren Oliver