Expert: encouraging entertainment zone drinking is a dangerous idea for cities
Daniel Skiles, a policy consultant at the Institute for Public Strategies--a public health-focused advocacy organization--explains why entertainment zone boozing (as SJ has learned) is a recipe for trouble.
A new CA state law authorizes the establishment of “entertainment zones,” as in SJ. As long as people purchase their libation at a nearby bar or restaurant, during a special event, people in these zones can legally stroll down the sidewalk while drinking.
But academics who have studied the increase in public, outdoor drinking sound a warning: Subsidizing public drinking may be a quick and dirty way to bring in some cash, but it has a steep downside, as SJ witnessed during the World Cup. The following from Daniel Skiles:
The impetus for changes to drinking laws came from the COVID-19 lockdown. Facing restrictions on indoor gatherings, small businesses like bars and restaurants struggled to stay open. To help them survive, many states rolled back alcohol regulations, allowing businesses to sell carry-out cocktails.
Studies have shown that when an area has more alcohol establishments, it also sees increased levels of violence and disorder. According to a review of multiple research studies, availability of alcohol is what generates these kinds of problems. Thus, expanding public drinking can only make matters worse.
“Anytime you have alcohol concentrated in a small area, there will inevitably be more violence and crime, which has the potential of spilling over into neighboring communities,” says Toben Nelson, a University of Minnesota professor of epidemiology and community health.
And once crime takes hold, a nightmare scenario can follow. Fearing they may become victims, many people start avoiding the area, causing the non-alcohol-based businesses to lose their customer base. Then as trash, noise, public drunkenness and other nuisance-related activities escalate, the entire region is drawn into a downward spiral of urban blight and economic decline.
“When policymakers tout the economic benefits of public drinking, they are completely ignoring the costs, which far outweigh the benefits,” Nelson says.
--Daniel Skiles, a policy consultant at the Institute for Public Strategies
Follow Opportunity Now on Twitter @svopportunity
We prize letters from our thoughtful readers. Typed on a Smith Corona. Written in longhand on fine stationery. Scribbled on a napkin. Hey, even composed on email. Feel free to send your comments to us at opportunitynowsv@gmail.com or (snail mail) 1590 Calaveras Ave., SJ, CA 95126. Remember to be thoughtful and polite. We will post letters on an irregular basis on the main Opp Now site.